Oral Antigen Tolerization in
Multiple Sclerosis
The myelin sheath is a critical
structural constituent of the nervous system. It acts as an electrical
insulator for the “wires” (nerve axons) that carry electrical signals
from the brain to the body. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an
inflammatory disease in which the body’s own immune system attacks
this protective, insulating tissue. The resulting damage to the myelin
appears in the form of “plaques” or “lesions” appear in seemingly
random areas in the central nervous system (CNS – the
brain and spinal cord).
While no one knows what causes
this derangement the immune system, we do know that the autoimmune
attack is the fundamental driver of the disease. The immune system’s
infiltrating T-cells somehow mistake myelin basic protein (MBP
– the immunologically-active protein which comprises 30% of the
polypeptides of CNS myelin) for a foreign invader, and mount a
destructive campaign to eradicate it. This constant inflammatory
assault leads to demyelination (the loss of the myelin sheath
from the nerves) and sometimes other forms of nerodegeneration.
As the disease progresses, the body’s
white matter becomes inflamed, neurons die, and the glial cells
that surround and nourish neurons either wither away or multiply
pathologically, leading to partial or complete loss of functions
controlled by the brain or spinal cord. Initial symptoms commonly
include weakness, numbness, tingling, sphincter disturbances, and
spastic weakness or paralysis of the legs. Victims suffer frequent
relapses and remissions that lead to increasing disability, weakness,
visual impairment, spasticity, and urinary incontinence. Approximately
20% of patients with multiple sclerosis experience truly aggressive,
debilitating symptoms, while the remainder may live a more or less
normal existence.
In the past, treatment for MS was
limited to potentially toxic immunosuppressive drugs such as
steroids and cyclophosphamides, along with a patchwork of
drug “band-aids” for some of the individual symptoms, such as vertigo,
fatigue, and depression. There is no specific long-term benefit of
these drugs: they may provide symptomatic relief, but they cannot
prevent further relapses. More recently, a new group treatments,
known as the “ABCR” (Avonex, Betaseron/Betaferon, Copaxone and Rebif)
drugs, have resulted in more meaningful treatment for the disease
process. But a cure remains elusive.
Oral
Tolerance
When taken orally, many proteins and
peptides are not destroyed by the digestive system, but remain intact
and immunologically active. As a result, they are able to interact
with the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), which
makes up about 70% of the body’s immune reactive cells. This appears
to cause the GALT to recognize the antigen as a common constituent of
the environment, the constant immunological attack of which would be
ruinous to the body – as, indeed, is the case in MS.
The result is a change in the way the
immune system as a whole responds to those peptides. At low doses,
oral antigens activate regulatory T cells that secrete
anti-inflammatory messenger-molecules (cytokines) such as
transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) and
interleukins 4 and -10 (IL-4 and IL-10). At higher
doses, oral antigens initiate a cascade in which the body actually
deletes the T-cells specific for the fed antigen. These multiple
mechanisms most probably evolved to maintain tolerance to the large
variety of proteins in the diet: otherwise, the immune system would be
engaged in a neverending war against the food in the intestinal tract
and the systemic circulation, leading to secondary malnutrition and
pathological chronic inflammation.
Oral tolerization was first demonstrated
in by researcher HG Wells in 1911, who showed that feeding guinea pigs
egg protein could prevent the sudden, severe, potentially
life-threatening allergic reaction to injections of the same proteins.
But in recent years, the lessons of oral antigen tolerization have
begun to be applied to autoimmune diseases, with successful
preliminary studies using type II collagen in rheumatoid
arthritis, insulin in type I (autoimmune) diabetes, and
retinal soluble antigen (S-Ag) in uveitis. Among the most
promising of these therapies is the use of oral myelin and
myelin basic protein as an oral tolerization therapy for MS.
Oral Myelin in Multiple Sclerosis
The specificity of the orally-induced
tolerance to MBP has been found to be strikingly species-dependent.
For example, feeding rats MBP from the guinea pig or human cadavers is
effective in protecting against experimentally-induced MS – yet
attempting to orally tolerize rats against their own, rat-type
MBP consistently fails. Bovine spinal myelin has been shown to be a
good choice for human usage.
Following numerous successful animal
experiments, phase I/II clinical trials conducted in humans throughout
the 1990s provided exciting evidence for the effectiveness of oral
antigen therapy in MS. In the first of these trials, Weiner et al
administered either a 300 milligram bovine myelin supplement or a
placebo protein to 30 relapsing-remitting MS victims for one year.
Users of oral myelin suffered only half the rate of major
attacks of the controls.
In open-label continuation of this
study, 16 patients either took up, or continued to take, oral bovine
myelin supplements for up to three years, being examined every three
months for their flareup rate and their functionality. While using
the bovine myelin supplement, MS victims’ flareup rate was cut by more
than two thirds, from an average of 1.6 flareups over each
of the two years before taking the supplement to just 0.5
flareups per annum while taking it.
In a series of related studies,
researchers were able to show the immunological basis of these
results. These trials confirm that, when you take an oral myelin
supplement, intact MBP appears in the your circulation. More
importantly, people suffering with MS who take bovine myelin
supplements experience the production of protective T-suppressor cells
that specifically recognize MBP. These T-suppressor cells
secrete the anti-inflammatory TGF-beta 1. These responses are
consistent with what’s seen in animal models of MS, where oral myelin
tolerization successfully treats the disease. No such changes
are seen the group not taking myelin. Related approaches, using
vaccination with the autoimmune T-cells themselves, T-cell receptor
peptides, or Cop-1 (a synthetic analog of MBP), have also been
shown to be effective, and support the oral tolerization approach.
Unfortunately, the clinical trials came
to an end in the late 1990s, after the placebo group in a
large, double-blind, controlled trial showed such remarkable progress
that it became impossible to statistically evaluate the value of the
oral myelin supplement. Still, the raw data from the trial revealed
some remarkable findings. For one thing, the fall in attack rate
in patients taking the myelin supplement was as or more impressive
than that seen with any of the “ABC” drugs. The study also showed
that MS sufferers who added oral myelin to Betaseron therapy had
fewer attacks than those taking Betaseron and placebo.
Meanwhile, drug manufacturers seem to
have realized that their ability to profit from oral myelin therapy
would be limited, because as a dietary supplement they would never be
able to impose restrictive patent protection on its use. Instead,
pharmaceutical companies have funded subsequent trials using
synthetic, patentable analogs or fragments of bovine
myelin, such as epitope P85 VVHFFKNIVTP96 and MBP8298.
Additionally, the outbreak of the
bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE – “mad cow disease”)
epidemic in Europe in the 1990s led to reluctance to use nervous
tissues as part of a therapy. Now that the nature of the disease is
better understood, however, all risk of BSE can be eliminated through
the use of supplements derived from lyophylized spinal extract from
free-range, pasture-fed, New Zealand or Australian livestock, which
can be absolutely guaranteed to be free of the infectious
prions that cause the disease.
The relentless drive of the
pharmaceutical giants for exclusive control over their products means
that the large-scale trials required for oral myelin tolerization to
be approved by national medical authorities are unlikely to ever be
completed. But the choice to pursue this option is available to
individuals in consultation with their doctors now, in the form
high-quality bovine myelin supplements.
References
Weiner HL. Oral tolerance for the
treatment of autoimmune diseases. Annu Rev Med. 1997; 48: 341-51.
Fukaura H, Kent SC, Pietrusewicz MJ,
Khoury SJ, Weiner HL, Hafler DA. Induction of circulating myelin basic
protein and proteolipid protein-specific transforming growth
factor-beta1-secreting Th3 T cells by oral administration of myelin in
multiple sclerosis patients. J Clin Invest. 1996 Jul 1; 98(1): 70-7.
Hohol MJ, Khoury SJ, Cook SL, Orav EJ,
Hafler DA, Weiner HL. Three-year open protocol continuation study of
oral tolerization with myelin antigens in multiple sclerosis and
design of a phase III pivotal trial. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996 Feb 13;
778: 243-50.
Whitacre CC, Gienapp IE, Meyer A, Cox KL,
Javed N. Treatment of autoimmune disease by oral tolerance to
autoantigens. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1996 Sep; 80(3 Pt 2): S31-9.
Weiner HL, Mackin GA, Matsui M, Orav EJ,
Khoury SJ, Dawson DM, Hafler DA. Double-blind pilot trial of oral
tolerization with myelin antigens in multiple sclerosis. Science. 1993
Feb 26; 259(5099): 1321-4.